STUDY THE WISDOM LESSONS (Seekers’
Lesson 3)
Erle Frayne D. Argonza
Greetings in the Almighty God’s I Am
Presence, Noble Seekers!
For this moment’s reflection, I’d stress on
the need to read and study the wisdom lessons or ‘the Teaching’. The essential
attitudes to observe regarding the Teaching goes by the social marketing line:
Read Everything, Question Everything, Doubt Nothing. Let’s go over these
attitudes one after the other.
Read Everything!
Read and study everything that would come
into mind as contributing to building a reflective, contemplative, wise self.
This is a very important aspect of your own ‘capacity building’ efforts.
It’s up to you to define where to begin.
Fact is, you may have already begun. In my case, I began with the Holy Bible:
page after page of it, hungry with knowledge and wisdom, I quaffed every wisdom
note that I could procure from both the Old and New Testaments. It’s the King
James version, coming from the Vatican ,
brought to my ancestral home by my gifted, genius grandfather. I was 15 years
old when I first went through it…. So, you can begin with scriptural materials.
There are many of you there who may find
scriptural materials as quite nauseating. “Geek! What Stone Age kind of things!
What Greek stuff!” (pardon me, dear Greeks!) Alright, if you’re this type, then
maybe you can begin with controversial materials. I was 17 when I read the
first controversial, mystical material, The Spear of Destiny by Trevor
Ravenscroft, a British white magician. The book came from my own biological
mom’s collection (we all have a Divine Mom, remember!). I almost went
ecstatically orgasmic while reading the stuff! More such materials came later.
You can do the same.
Maybe you can begin with the conspiracy
materials. Those among you who are fond of detective novels can perhaps be
titillated with conspiracy stuff. There’s The Hiram Key by Christopher
Knight and Robert Lomas, Their Kingdom Come/Inside the Secret World of Opus
Dei by Robert Hutchison, and more reads. There are so many reads on this
stuff on internet by the way, and most likely so many of you Seekers have
already done research on them.
Perhaps the esoteric philosophy materials
could be your entry point. These texts go by their wisdom traditions:
Theosophy, Kabbalah, Essene, Gnosis, Druid, Eleusinian, Sufi, Esoteric
Buddhism, Esoteric Christianity, Freemasonry, Anthroposophy, Mayan, Native
American, Babaylan (Malayo-Philippine), Veda, Vedanta, Tantra, Tao, and related
items. You may focus on just one tradition, but I’d highly recommend that you
also do research on the others across time. I began with theosophy, circa 1980,
I guess because these lessons were largely those synthesized by my guru El
Morya and his team, which he then passed on (channeled) to HP Blavatsky and her
team.
Transdisciplinal materials could suit you
as entry point. They combine philosophy and sciences’ discourses into an
exquisitely woven singular material. Tao of Physics by Deepak Chopra is
an excellent example of the transdisciplinal type. Zecharia Sitchin also writes
using transdisciplinal methodology, which you will observe in such books of his
as The Wars of Gods and Men and Divine Encounters.
You may be drawn the strongest to psychism
and magic. Edgar Cayce’s psychic readings would be fitting start ups. Ravenscroft
is also into this genre. U.S. Andersen’s Secret Powers of Pyramids is
another example. Wicca could also be worth reviewing for you. Materials on
evocative magic may also attract you. There’s also sex magic, such as the Toaist
Secrets of Love by Mantak Chia. Materials on prophecy and futuristics made
by mystics and psychics are related ones. Go ahead, please read them.
So, Noble Seekers, there is no fixed
formula as to which reading to start. Feel it from your heart, take away those
barriers of mind that could deter you along the path. But never forget: read
all of those generic materials as much as possible. They are all important.
Stay away from thoughts that “these are more important than those ones,”
“scriptures are Stone Age and irrelevant,” “My God! Scary New Age stuff! That’s
Lucifer’s footnotes!” If you think this way, thou art no seeker at all.
Question Everything!
“Oh My God! That’s
wonderful!”…”My God, those texts are exceedingly wise! I’d follow them all!”
“Look at Deepak Chopra! He’s great and superman! I’ll read only him from now
on!”
Hello! Aren’t you Seekers? Only the cult
devotees romanticize certain teachings and texts and tend to look down on
others as filthy and small-time. Read everything, but also add the element of a
critical mind while you reflect and contemplate on the texts. Never worship the
texts or its writers.
I am a Filipino, and I was reared to a
great extent in Anglo-Saxon philosophy that was brought to the islands by the
Americans and the post-colonial scholars. I was also schooled at the University
of the Philippines
(main campus), where the critical tradition is dominant and sacrosanct till
these days. The Germanic-continental tradition is an addition in my alma mater,
the sociology department. The critical tradition has been with me since, and I
find the critical mind very helpful for reflection purposes.
I was also trained as a
scientist—sociologist and political economist—and I always bear with me the
thinking that every text that I read contains errors or gaps. No text
whatsoever is so perfect that it would withstand the test of time and be
all-relevant for all times. There also is no such thing as ‘Theory Of
Everything’ or TOE, and I’m allergic to any contention about certain texts
categorically declared as meta-narratives fit for all situations and
explanatory of all phenomena. That’s pure dung!
Always allow some space for critical mental
process, for some questionings. As in any scientific work, there always is a
possibility of 10% error. As a scientist, I’m already very happy when critiques
would say I’m hitting 90%. Upon releasing my book 13th Gate
Unveiled, a prophetic-futuristic book about the Philippines , ASEAN, and the
Aquarian Age, I was gladdened by a note from a fellow mystic Rachel Somera when
she claimed that I was hitting 90% accuracy. What a high mark for an amateur
prophet!
In my own experience of readings on
theosophy, I was almost completely mesmerized by the brilliant synthesis of HP
Blavatsky. Her team mates—Hodson, Leadbeater, A. Bessant, Q. Judge—were all
able mystics and thinkers, and met my expectations of what Teachers should be:
as Thinkers first and foremost. But their treatment of the ‘Lucifer Question’
got me raising questions. This gap somehow led to the adoption of Theosophy as
a foundational reading by secret societies of Fallen Ones such as Hitler’s Germanenorden.
One gets the feeling that “Lucifer is Cool!” after going through the Lucifer
aspect of their reflections. I don’t buy that part. And I was led into further
research to get clarified about the ‘Lucifer Question’. I’m still researching
on the Lucifer item till these days.
Not only that. The time-frames used by
Blavatsky in her estimations of the evolution of human generic types—called
‘root races’—seem unbelievably and overwhelmingly long! Is this the only way of
looking at time periods or timelines? It is more apparent to me that Blavatsky
& team was largely seeing reality, including time period and the
evolutionary pattern (cycical), from the focal lenses of a paradigm (to use Thomas
Kuhn’s term). I was right in my questions as I stumbled upon texts, such as
those written by the fellow mystic & teacher Sal Rachele, indicating the
paradigm-fixation of many texts. Needless to say, our view of the time periods
can also change, the timelines of ancient history can change, depending on the
paradigm we employ in our analysis or exegesis of the templates of life.
I should like to share more questions here,
but space doesn’t allow. To end this portion, Noble Seekers, go ahead and raise
questions. Keep tab of them, jot them down if possible. These questions will
lead you to do research all the more, and this is what ‘seeking’ as an attitude
is all about: texts should be able to provoke you into raising questions, and
into doing inquiries along the way.
Doubt Nothing!
When you are able to raise questions
properly—meaning to say, the texts passed through your inquisitive eyes and
critical mind—than you can move on to ascertain truths about realities. The
truth criterion, in my mind, is still a very relevant criterion, and I do not
go along with the contentions of the post-modernist about the matter who regard
the truth criterion as hubris.
Anything that is absolutist is a
questionable thing to me. Fixed Idea is dangerous and obnoxious. But it is
equally dangerous and obnoxious to throw away the truth criterion. “Aha that’s
passé! There’s nothing today but the all-luring power of Desire! The Primal!
What truths are you talking about?” That’s the line of the followers of
Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, Baudrillard and the post-structuralists, and they are
entitled to their opinions. But think many times before you regard the truth
criterion as trash.
Nothing can stop you from perceiving facets
of reality as paradigmatic: you can observe them from different angles, and
your inferences or conclusions will depend largely on the vantage point from
which you perceive them. For instance, in Theosophy, the ontological dimensions
are thought of as comprising 7 dimensions of existence, with 7 corresponding bodies
of man. There are some other texts that have a different view, as they employ
the ‘density’ category rather than ‘dimension’ category. Accordingly, there are
’12 densities’, we are 3rd density humans in the physical plane,
that the planet will evolve shortly into a 4th density planet, and
so on.
There may be variances in inferences due to
paradigm differences, as observed above. But one thing is certain at least: the
physical plane, where we live, isn’t the only ontological dimension, and that,
logically and empirically, there are dimensions higher than the 3rd
dimension or 3rd density. And because of this certainty, I will
never doubt the existence of beings in other dimensions, as they can be
empirically observed and known. And I will never doubt the existence of the
all-pervasive, all-guiding Almighty God, as both inductively and through yoga
meditation I am certain of the existence of the Highest Cosmic Being and of
ontological planes higher than the physical plane.
I’m not saying that doubting is a bad
thing. What I’m saying is that in the end, you must establish certainties based
on the truth criterion. That would be the start of increased wisdom.
So here we end, Noble Seekers. Prepare your
own research agenda, trust your Inner Guide in the process, and you’re into
this version of ‘magical mystery tour’. Good luck in your enquiries!
[Writ 04 October 2007, Quezon City , MetroManila]