SIMPLE WORDS
Erle
Frayne Argonza / Ra
In every production of my pen
Of full narrative or poem
I’m compelled to write in simple
Words that folks could comprehend
It’s no joke to dazzle minds
With jargons and magical words
For just like magic on a wand’s stroke
Will make the denouement outpace
The cognition of the enthusiastic
viewer
Will only obscure the thought presented
And leave the consciousness dangling
On rotten vines of superstition and
illusion
For I’m supposed to offer
Lines that shatter false images
It’s so that every undertaking
Of thinking and imagining
Will irradiate the knowing viewer
With rays of clarity and concreteness
[Writ. 06 June 1988, Angeles City,
Pampanga, on a visit to the Angeles University Foundation.]
REFLECTION
The manner of articulation, whether to be elegant
or to be simple in presentation, is really one of personal choice. Being
schooled in college in the University of the Philippines, where the ‘school of
elegance’ prevailed, I had to consciously remind myself of the full import of
writing and speaking with simplicity, thus diverging from my own fellow alumni
who bore with them the elegance that was to make marks in their work
situations.
I was actually influenced by Albert Einstein who
urged theoretical physicists to discourse with simplicity. Having been exposed
to theoretical physics and social sciences as a young man, it was a tall order
to follow the ‘school of simplicity’. I admitted that at times I veered too far
away from it, as my writings turned out too abstruse and complex, unreadable
even to my fellow academics (they kept on complaining that they cannot
understand an iota of my discourse).
Yet I found out early how Einstein, born a gifted
child, was able to present his general and special theories with utter simplicity.
If the noblesse theoretician can do it, likewise can I do it. Many spiritual
masters actually took the choice of simplicity, even as their being so wise and
pure already made them stand out as elegant Beings of Light.
Being simple in articulation doesn’t mean being
simplistic. The latter is a flaw of reductionism, which should be avoided. No
matter how complex your subject of presentation is, you can simplify it no less
and yet show such a complexity before your audience or readers in more digestible
verbiage.
Ra
March 2011
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Come
Visit E. Argonza’s blogs & website anytime!
Social
Blogs:
IKONOKLAST:
http://erleargonza.blogspot.com
UNLADTAU:
http://unladtau.wordpress.com
Wisdom/Spiritual
Blogs:
COSMICBUHAY:
http://cosmicbuhay.blogspot.com
BRIGHTWORLD:
http://erlefraynebrightworld.wordpress.com
Poetry
& Art Blogs:
ARTBLOG:
http://erleargonza.wordpress.com
ARGONZAPOEM:
http://argonzapoem.blogspot.com
Mixed
Blends Blogs:
@MULTIPLY:
http://efdargon.multiply.com
@FRIENDSTER:
http://erleargonza.blog.friendster.com
@SOULCAST:
http://www.soulcast.com/efdargon
Website:
PROF.
ERLE FRAYNE ARGONZA: http://erleargonza.com
No comments:
Post a Comment